Responsible & Ethical AI
Interrogative Reasoning is a community-centered framework that treats ethical AI as a question of power, belief, and timing — not just technical design. Accountability grows through many humans in the loop, not one.
The Theory of Interrogative Reasoning by Jameila “Meme” StylesPower
Who decides what this AI does — and who does it affect?
HT organizers set every rule. The AI cannot make decisions about you, your gift, or your data.
Belief
Whose experience is trusted?
Jordan and Mayhem are clearly labeled as AI. They never invent statistics, real people, or dollar amounts.
Timing
When can people question the system?
Right now. Every AI moment has a “Question this AI” button, so concerns are raised before harm, not after.
Many Humans in the Loop
Who reviews it?
Feedback from guests, students, faculty, and community members shapes the next version — not a single reviewer.
Our AI governance commitments
Transparency
Jordan is an imagined future graduate voiced by AI. Mayhem is an AI character. The Legacy match is a simple, fixed scoring of your answers — not a judgment of you.
Privacy
Please never share personal, financial, or health details with the AI. No names, emails, or recordings are stored. Voice audio goes straight to the AI provider for the live call and is not saved by this experience.
Consent
The microphone only turns on when you tap “Talk to Jordan,” and you can end the call anytime.
No pressure
The AI never decides or suggests how much you give. Giving is always your choice.
Human accountability
Meme Styles is responsible for this AI experience, under HT’s AI Policy. Every “Question this AI” response goes to her, not a bot.
HT AI Policy
This experience follows HT's official AI Policy: transparency, human oversight, privacy, and the right to question AI.
Read the Huston-Tillotson University AI PolicyAI at HTMeme Styles · Responsible for this AI experience